Crossject Zeneo®

Crossject Zeneo®

We love the idea, but it’s not viable for the everyday consumer for long-term use. Where Crossject’s Zeneo® product shines is in situations where a patient needs only a few dosages. It’s not cost effective for long-term use. Our other issue with this is the environmental impact. Not only does it use gas to function, but it creates a lot of waste.

Crossject Zeneo®

7.1

Safety

9.5/10

Ease of Use

9.5/10

Reliability

9.0/10

Support

5.0/10

Availability & Supplies

2.5/10

Pros

  • Great for one time use
  • Good for hospitals

Cons

  • Disposable
  • Only one dose
  • Limited medicines
  • Cost
  • Waste, Environmental Pollution

Similar Posts
The Comfort-In™ Needle Free Injector
The Comfort-In™ Needle Free Injector
The Comfort-in™ is gaining popularity around the world for a number of reasons. First, the company behind it has years...
Insujet® Needle Free Injector
Insujet® Needle Free Injector
The Insujet® was developed with one application. Insulin delivery. While that may sound good if that’s your main purpose for...
Portal Instruments Needle Free Injector
Portal Instruments Needle Free Injector
The needle-free injector by Portal Instruments has a lot of promise. Developed at MIT, they take it a step further...

There are no comments yet, add one below.

Leave a Reply


You must belogged in to post a comment.